![]() The updates are also more synchronized between Cubase and Nuendo, but I don't know if that affects introduction of new features or just bug fixes and other performance/stability improvements.Įxpect better support from Steinberg if you own Nuendo, if you ever need to ask or request something. I haven't, because the internets. This changed recently and now Nuendo gets more frequent updates. ![]() Traditionally, Nuendo had a longer update cycle, meaning that: Cubase has caught up to match Nuendo in most aspects. ![]() If you don't do any of the latter, Nuendo is not a "better" version of Cubase, just more expensive. So expect any post-production/film/game/VR/collaboration -related features to land on Nuendo first. ![]() Nuendo better facilitates working on and sharing large projects with a team. You also get additional effects, mostly pertaining to these areas. Nuendo for post-production and video work, working with more channels (surround in films/games), VR, working with large number of sound effects, dubbing, commercial game engines and versioning system (Perforce). So you can expect music production related features to land on Cubase first. Some features make it into Cubase first, some into Nuendo, and are later added to the other.Ĭubase is more segmented for music production. 5 version upgrades cost money (you can skip upgrading of course) , in Nuendo they are free. Maybe there´s some advantage to using Cubase instead that I don´t see yet?Ĭubase has the collaborative tool "VST Transit", Nuendo doesn't.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |